![]() ![]() Real-life experience so far beats everything available on the market for the general consumer.Ĭompared to Doom, Quake had advanced lighting (via light maps), shading, better texture mapping (via MIP maps, reducing the aliasing artifacts observable when looking at distant objects) and 3d objects instead of sprites. Currently we don't have such a mighty technology in our computers and TVs. Perhaps the truest 3d possible is one that is indistinguishable from what you see in real life, meaning photographically-realistic quality of rendering of objects, lighting, shades, fully taking into account changes as they happen in real time, creating the sense of depth and also changing with the viewer's position, their use of left, right or both eyes and changing focus. ![]() I don't think there's a single universal definition. You can find more information on the Doom wiki and on Wikipedia - both are derived from a write-up I wrote on everything2 years ago. It's like extending the vertical height of the screen and then providing a window into it that moves up and down. True vertical look up and down isn't possible for the reasons you explain - games such as Heretic and Hexen which added the ability to do this used Y-shearing, which is essentially a hack. This makes sure that they are rendered in order, so that far away walls are occluded by closer ones. The geometry of the level is divided into a binary tree, and that tree is walked down to render the scene.Īt each point in the tree there are two subtrees, and these are walked in an order that depends on the location of the player in relation to the line that divides them. Just to point out, Doom's rendering engine is not a raycaster (as Wolfenstein 3D is) - that is, it doesn't work by casting a ray for each column of the screen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |